China stores crude oil both ways: in large aboveground tank farms and in sealed underground caverns, and the mix is deliberate. Underground storage is cheaper to protect and much harder for outside observers to measure, which is one reason the true size of China’s reserve is an estimate rather than a fact. This answer explains where and how China stores its oil, why it uses underground sites, and what the storage mix tells energy professionals trying to read Chinese demand.<\/p>\n
La Chine stocke son p\u00e9trole brut de deux mani\u00e8res physiquement distinctes et les utilise conjointement. La plus visible est le parc de stockage a\u00e9rien, constitu\u00e9 de rang\u00e9es de grands r\u00e9servoirs en acier que les satellites peuvent photographier et dont les analystes comptent les donn\u00e9es pour estimer les variations de stock. Des bases comme Lanzhou et Tianjin sont de ce type. Le mode de stockage moins visible est le stockage souterrain, o\u00f9 le p\u00e9trole est conserv\u00e9 dans des cavernes rocheuses \u00e9tanches ou des installations couvertes, un syst\u00e8me utilis\u00e9 sur des sites c\u00f4tiers comme Huangdao. Les descriptions officielles et acad\u00e9miques du programme de r\u00e9serves d\u00e9crivent les modes de stockage a\u00e9rien et souterrain combin\u00e9s, ce qui est essentiel\u00a0: il ne s\u2019agit pas de l\u2019un ou de l\u2019autre, mais d\u2019une combinaison d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9e.<\/p>\n
La r\u00e9serve a \u00e9t\u00e9 constitu\u00e9e par \u00e9tapes, d'abord le long de la c\u00f4te, puis vers l'int\u00e9rieur des terres. Les sites de la premi\u00e8re phase ont \u00e9t\u00e9 s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9s dans les villes c\u00f4ti\u00e8res de Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao et Dalian, \u00e0 proximit\u00e9 des raffineries et des terminaux d'importation recevant le p\u00e9trole brut maritime. La deuxi\u00e8me phase a \u00e9tendu le r\u00e9seau vers l'int\u00e9rieur des terres, notamment \u00e0 Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou et Zhanjiang, r\u00e9partissant ainsi la r\u00e9serve sur les c\u00f4tes est et ouest, tout en laissant les r\u00e9gions du centre et du sud-ouest largement d\u00e9pourvues de bases. Cette r\u00e9partition g\u00e9ographique r\u00e9pond \u00e0 une logique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d'approvisionnement\u00a0: stocker le p\u00e9trole brut \u00e0 proximit\u00e9 de ses lieux de d\u00e9barquement et de raffinage, et assurer une distribution strat\u00e9gique afin qu'aucune perturbation ne vienne \u00e9puiser le syst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n
Il existe deux raisons pratiques et une raison strat\u00e9gique. Sur le plan pratique, la construction et l'entretien \u00e0 grande \u00e9chelle de cavernes souterraines peuvent s'av\u00e9rer moins co\u00fbteux que la construction de r\u00e9servoirs en acier \u00e9quivalents. De plus, elles offrent une bien meilleure protection contre les intemp\u00e9ries, les incendies et les attaques, un atout essentiel pour une r\u00e9serve dont la vocation premi\u00e8re est de permettre la survie en cas de crise. Sur le plan strat\u00e9gique, le stockage souterrain est difficilement observable de l'ext\u00e9rieur. Un parc de r\u00e9servoirs peut \u00eatre \u00e9valu\u00e9 gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la hauteur de ses toits flottants sur les images satellites\u00a0; une caverne souterraine, en revanche, est invisible. Pour un pays qui consid\u00e8re la taille de sa r\u00e9serve strat\u00e9gique comme un enjeu de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, cette invisibilit\u00e9 constitue un avantage, et non un inconv\u00e9nient.<\/p>\n
This is where storage design meets the wider puzzle of Chinese oil data. Because part of the reserve sits underground and because Beijing stopped publishing comprehensive official figures after the mid-2010s and reports no crude stock data to the International Energy Agency, outside estimates of China’s total reserve vary widely, commonly cited in a range of roughly 1.2 to 1.47 billion barrels, which on the IEA’s net-imports basis equates to well over 90 days of cover on most credible estimates. Those are estimates, marked here as estimates, precisely because the storage mix and the reporting silence make direct measurement impossible. Project 54 has examined the measurement problem in why China does not publish its oil reserves and why the estimates vary between sources, and the underground share of storage is a large part of the answer.<\/p>\n
Pour quiconque s'int\u00e9resse \u00e0 la vente, aux pr\u00e9visions ou au trading de p\u00e9trole en lien avec la demande chinoise, la composition des stocks n'est pas un d\u00e9tail, mais un signal d'alarme quant \u00e0 la fiabilit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es. Lorsque la Chine ach\u00e8te plus de p\u00e9trole brut que ses raffineries n'en traitent, le surplus est stock\u00e9, et les analystes d\u00e9duisent la constitution des stocks \u00e0 partir de l'\u00e9cart entre les importations, la production et l'activit\u00e9 des raffineries. Cependant, si une part significative de ce surplus dispara\u00eet dans des installations de stockage souterraines impossibles \u00e0 recenser, la m\u00e9thode d'estimation implicite pr\u00e9sente une lacune permanente, et les affirmations cat\u00e9goriques quant \u00e0 la quantit\u00e9 exacte de p\u00e9trole stock\u00e9 par la Chine doivent \u00eatre interpr\u00e9t\u00e9es avec prudence. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est celle d'une fourchette, et non d'un chiffre pr\u00e9cis.<\/p>\n
En pratique, il convient de consid\u00e9rer les capacit\u00e9s de stockage chinoises comme un indicateur \u00e0 recouper, et non comme un chiffre \u00e0 citer. Les donn\u00e9es satellitaires sur les parcs de stockage visibles, les donn\u00e9es douani\u00e8res sur les importations, les taux d'utilisation des raffineries et les annonces de nouvelles capacit\u00e9s apportent chacun un \u00e9clairage sur la situation. Ces annonces sont d'ailleurs bien r\u00e9elles\u00a0: des entreprises d'\u00c9tat comme Sinopec et CNOOC pr\u00e9voient d'ajouter au moins 169 millions de barils de capacit\u00e9 sur une dizaine de nouveaux sites entre 2025 et 2026. Cette expansion t\u00e9moigne de la tendance\u00a0: la Chine continue d'accro\u00eetre ses capacit\u00e9s de stockage de p\u00e9trole, m\u00eame si le niveau exact reste volontairement flou. Pour les fournisseurs et les analystes, la rigueur est la m\u00eame que celle appliqu\u00e9e par Project 54 pour l'ensemble de sa couverture de la Chine\u00a0: indiquer des fourchettes de prix, pr\u00e9ciser sa m\u00e9thode de calcul et indiquer clairement qu'il s'agit d'estimations.<\/p>\n
Oui. La Chine utilise \u00e0 la fois des parcs de stockage a\u00e9riens en acier et des stockages souterrains \u00e9tanches, notamment des cavernes rocheuses remplies d'eau sur des sites c\u00f4tiers comme Huangdao. Son programme de r\u00e9serves strat\u00e9giques de p\u00e9trole combine d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment les modes de stockage a\u00e9rien et souterrain, car le stockage souterrain est moins co\u00fbteux \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger et beaucoup plus difficile \u00e0 contr\u00f4ler pour les observateurs ext\u00e9rieurs.<\/p>\n
La r\u00e9serve a \u00e9t\u00e9 constitu\u00e9e par phases. Les sites c\u00f4tiers de la phase I se situent \u00e0 Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao et Dalian, \u00e0 proximit\u00e9 des terminaux d'importation et des raffineries. Les sites int\u00e9rieurs de la phase II comprennent Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou et Zhanjiang, \u00e9tendant ainsi la r\u00e9serve le long des c\u00f4tes est et ouest afin de garantir la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d'approvisionnement.<\/p>\n
Les cavernes souterraines sont moins co\u00fbteuses \u00e0 construire et \u00e0 entretenir \u00e0 grande \u00e9chelle, mieux prot\u00e9g\u00e9es contre les intemp\u00e9ries, les incendies et les attaques, et beaucoup plus difficiles \u00e0 observer de l'ext\u00e9rieur. Pour une r\u00e9serve strat\u00e9gique destin\u00e9e \u00e0 assurer la survie en cas de crise et dont la taille est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e par la Chine comme un enjeu de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, cette protection et cette invisibilit\u00e9 constituent des atouts majeurs.<\/p>\n
Les estimations externes varient g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement entre 1,2 et 1,47 milliard de barils, ce qui, sur la base des importations nettes de l'AIE, correspond \u00e0 une couverture de plus de 90 jours selon les estimations les plus cr\u00e9dibles. Il s'agit d'estimations car une partie des r\u00e9serves est stock\u00e9e sous terre et ne peut \u00eatre mesur\u00e9e de l'ext\u00e9rieur, et parce que P\u00e9kin a cess\u00e9 de publier des chiffres exhaustifs apr\u00e8s le milieu des ann\u00e9es 2010 et ne communique aucune donn\u00e9e sur ses stocks de p\u00e9trole brut \u00e0 l'AIE.<\/p>\n
Oui. Les entreprises publiques, dont Sinopec et CNOOC, pr\u00e9voient d'ajouter au moins 169 millions de barils de capacit\u00e9 de stockage sur une dizaine de nouveaux sites entre 2025 et 2026. L'empreinte \u00e9cologique continue de s'\u00e9tendre, m\u00eame si le volume exact de p\u00e9trole stock\u00e9 reste volontairement flou.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
China stores crude oil both ways: in large aboveground tank farms and in sealed underground caverns, and the mix is deliberate. Underground storage is cheaper to protect and much harder for outside observers to measure, which is one reason the true size of China’s reserve is an estimate rather than a fact. This answer explains where and how China stores its oil, why it uses underground sites, and what the storage mix tells energy professionals trying to read Chinese demand.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"p54_article_data":"{\"meta\": {\"kicker\": \"Answer \u00b7 Oil Reserves\", \"topics\": [\"Analysis\", \"Energy\"], \"title\": \"Does China Store Oil Underground? Salt Caverns, Tank Farms and Why It Matters\", \"dek\": \"China stores crude oil both ways: in large aboveground tank farms and in sealed underground caverns, and the mix is deliberate. Underground storage is cheaper to protect and much harder for outside observers to measure, which is one reason the true size of China's reserve is an estimate rather than a fact. This answer explains where and how China stores its oil, why it uses underground sites, and what the storage mix tells energy professionals trying to read Chinese demand.\", \"date\": \"8 August 2026\", \"readTime\": \"8 min read\", \"author\": \"Project 54, Research & Strategy\", \"listenTime\": \"22 min listen\"}, \"quickAnswer\": {\"q\": \"Does China store oil underground?\", \"a\": \"Yes. China stores crude oil in two ways, in large aboveground steel tank farms and in sealed underground storage such as water-sealed rock caverns, and its strategic reserve programme combines both modes. Coastal sites like Huangdao include underground caverns, while many bases, for example Lanzhou and Tianjin, are aboveground tank farms. China uses underground storage because it is cheaper to secure, better protected, and far harder for satellites and outside analysts to measure, which is one reason the true size of China's reserve is an estimate rather than a published figure.\"}, \"takeaways\": [\"China uses both aboveground tank farms and underground storage, including water-sealed rock caverns at coastal sites such as Huangdao, so the answer to whether it stores oil underground is a clear yes.\", \"Its strategic petroleum reserve was built in phases: coastal Phase I sites at Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao and Dalian, and inland Phase II sites including Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou and Zhanjiang.\", \"Underground caverns are chosen because they are cheaper to protect and much harder to observe from the outside, which contributes directly to the opacity of China's reserve figures.\", \"State companies including Sinopec and CNOOC plan to add at least 169 million barrels of storage capacity across roughly 11 new sites during 2025 and 2026, so the storage footprint is still expanding.\"], \"sections\": [{\"id\": \"both\", \"q\": \"How does China actually store its oil?\", \"h\": \"Two modes, used together on purpose\", \"p\": [\"China stores crude oil in two physically different ways and uses them together. The most visible is the aboveground tank farm, the rows of large steel tanks that satellites can photograph and that analysts count to estimate stock changes. Bases such as Lanzhou and Tianjin are of this type. The less visible mode is underground storage, where oil is held in sealed rock caverns or covered facilities, a design used at coastal sites including Huangdao. Official and academic descriptions of the reserve programme describe ground and underground reserve modes combined, which is the key point: this is not one or the other, it is a deliberate mix.\", \"The reserve was built in phases along the coast first and then inland. Phase I sites were selected in the coastal cities of Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao and Dalian, close to the refineries and import terminals that receive seaborne crude. Phase II extended the network inland, to sites including Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou and Zhanjiang, spreading the reserve across the eastern coast and the west while leaving the central and south-west regions largely without bases. The geography follows the logic of supply security, keep barrels near where they land and where they are refined, and hold a strategic spread so no single disruption empties the system.\"], \"table\": {\"cols\": [\"Storage mode\", \"Example sites\", \"How visible to outsiders\"], \"rows\": [[\"Aboveground tank farm\", \"Lanzhou, Tianjin\", \"High, tanks can be counted from satellite imagery\"], [\"Underground caverns and covered sites\", \"Huangdao\", \"Low, volumes are hard to observe or verify\"], [\"Coastal Phase I\", \"Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao, Dalian\", \"Mixed, near import terminals and refineries\"], [\"Inland Phase II\", \"Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou, Zhanjiang\", \"Mixed, spread for supply security\"]]}}, {\"id\": \"why\", \"q\": \"Why does China use underground storage at all?\", \"h\": \"Cheaper to protect, and much harder to measure\", \"p\": [\"There are two practical reasons and one strategic one. Practically, underground caverns can be cheaper to build and maintain at scale than equivalent steel tankage, and they are far better protected against weather, fire and attack, which matters for a reserve whose entire purpose is to survive a crisis. Strategically, underground storage is difficult to observe from the outside. A tank farm can be measured by the floating roofs of its tanks in satellite imagery, an underground cavern cannot. For a country that treats the size of its strategic reserve as a matter of national security, that invisibility is a feature, not a drawback.\", \"This is where storage design meets the wider puzzle of Chinese oil data. Because part of the reserve sits underground and because Beijing stopped publishing comprehensive official figures after the mid-2010s and reports no crude stock data to the International Energy Agency, outside estimates of China's total reserve vary widely, commonly cited in a range of roughly 1.2 to 1.47 billion barrels, which on the IEA's net-imports basis equates to well over 90 days of cover on most credible estimates. Those are estimates, marked here as estimates, precisely because the storage mix and the reporting silence make direct measurement impossible. Project 54 has examined the measurement problem in why China does not publish its oil reserves and why the estimates vary between sources, and the underground share of storage is a large part of the answer.\"]}, {\"id\": \"matters\", \"q\": \"Why does the storage mix matter for energy professionals?\", \"h\": \"It shapes how much you can trust a demand signal\", \"p\": [\"For anyone selling into, forecasting, or trading around Chinese oil demand, the storage mix is not trivia, it is a warning about data quality. When China buys more crude than its refineries process, the surplus goes into storage, and analysts infer stock builds from the gap between imports, production and refinery runs. But if a meaningful share of that surplus disappears into underground caverns that cannot be counted, the implied-build method has a permanent blind spot, and confident claims about exactly how much China is stockpiling should be read with caution. The honest position is a range, not a number.\", \"The practical takeaway is to treat Chinese storage as a signal to be triangulated, not a figure to be quoted. Satellite counts of visible tank farms, customs import data, refinery run rates and announced capacity additions each tell part of the story, and the announced additions are real: state companies including Sinopec and CNOOC plan to add at least 169 million barrels of capacity across roughly 11 new sites during 2025 and 2026. That expansion tells you the direction of travel, China is still building the ability to hold more oil, even when the exact level held stays deliberately unclear. For suppliers and analysts, the discipline is the same one Project 54 applies across its China coverage, quote ranges, name your method, and mark estimates as estimates.\"]}], \"media\": {\"image\": {\"src\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/wp-content\/themes\/p54-media-assets\/china-strategic-oil-storage-complex.jpg\", \"label\": \"China stores oil in both aboveground tank farms and sealed underground caverns, the mix is deliberate and part of why the true total is an estimate.\", \"credit\": \"Project 54\"}, \"infographicLabel\": \"Two storage modes, coastal and inland phases, and roughly 169 million barrels of new capacity across about 11 sites planned for 2025 to 2026.\", \"pdf\": {\"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/wp-content\/themes\/p54-media-assets\/does-china-store-oil-underground.pdf\", \"title\": \"Does China Store Oil Underground, Slide Deck\", \"meta\": \"PDF, briefing deck\"}, \"podcast\": {\"src\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/does-china-store-oil-underground-podcast.m4a\", \"title\": \"China's Underground Oil Reserves\", \"ep\": \"P54 Energy Growth Brief\", \"duration\": \"22:04\"}}, \"poll\": {\"q\": \"What is the most useful way to read China's oil storage?\", \"options\": [{\"id\": \"a\", \"label\": \"As a deliberate mix of visible and hidden storage\", \"insight\": \"The design read. Aboveground tanks can be counted, underground caverns cannot, and China uses both on purpose.\"}, {\"id\": \"b\", \"label\": \"As the reason reserve figures are only estimates\", \"insight\": \"The data read. Underground storage plus no official reporting means the total is a range, commonly 1.2 to 1.47 billion barrels, not a fact.\"}, {\"id\": \"c\", \"label\": \"As a security choice, protection over transparency\", \"insight\": \"The strategic read. Caverns are cheaper to protect and harder to observe, and for a strategic reserve that invisibility is the point.\"}, {\"id\": \"d\", \"label\": \"As a signal to triangulate, never to quote raw\", \"insight\": \"The analyst read. Combine satellite counts, customs data and refinery runs, and mark the answer as an estimate.\"}], \"note\": \"No tallies, just where you stand. The consistent discipline is to quote ranges and name your method.\"}, \"faq\": [{\"q\": \"Does China store oil underground?\", \"a\": \"Yes. China uses both aboveground steel tank farms and sealed underground storage, including water-sealed rock caverns at coastal sites such as Huangdao. Its strategic petroleum reserve programme combines ground and underground modes deliberately, because underground storage is cheaper to protect and much harder for outside observers to measure.\"}, {\"q\": \"Where are China's strategic oil storage sites?\", \"a\": \"The reserve was built in phases. Coastal Phase I sites are at Zhenhai, Zhoushan, Huangdao and Dalian, near import terminals and refineries. Inland Phase II sites include Tianjin, Jinzhou, Dushanzi, Lanzhou, Jintan, Huizhou and Zhanjiang, spreading the reserve across the eastern coast and the west for supply security.\"}, {\"q\": \"Why does China store oil underground?\", \"a\": \"Underground caverns can be cheaper to build and maintain at scale, are better protected against weather, fire and attack, and are far harder to observe from the outside. For a strategic reserve whose purpose is to survive a crisis and whose size China treats as a national-security matter, that protection and invisibility are both advantages.\"}, {\"q\": \"How much oil does China store, and why is it only an estimate?\", \"a\": \"Outside estimates commonly range from roughly 1.2 to 1.47 billion barrels, which on the IEA net-imports basis equates to well over 90 days of cover on most credible estimates. These are estimates because part of the reserve sits in underground storage that cannot be measured from outside, and because Beijing stopped publishing comprehensive figures after the mid-2010s and reports no crude stock data to the IEA.\"}, {\"q\": \"Is China still adding oil storage capacity?\", \"a\": \"Yes. State companies including Sinopec and CNOOC plan to add at least 169 million barrels of storage capacity across roughly 11 new sites during 2025 and 2026. The footprint is still expanding even though the exact volume of oil held stays deliberately unclear.\"}], \"newsletter\": {\"kicker\": \"The Energy Growth Brief\", \"title\": [\"Get the next\", \"intelligence drop\"], \"body\": \"Join energy and industrial leaders getting our marketing, AI-growth and revenue-architecture intelligence, direct, no filler.\", \"cta\": \"Subscribe\", \"note\": \"No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We read every reply.\", \"success\": \"You're on the list\", \"successBody\": \"Welcome to The Energy Growth Brief, watch your inbox for the next dispatch.\", \"cadence\": \"Twice monthly\", \"reach\": \"Gulf, MENA, Asia, Europe\"}, \"related\": [{\"title\": \"How Much Oil Storage Capacity Does China Have in 2026?\", \"topic\": \"Energy\", \"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/china-oil-storage-capacity\/\"}, {\"title\": \"Why Doesn't China Publish Its Oil Reserve Levels?\", \"topic\": \"Energy\", \"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/why-china-doesnt-publish-oil-reserves\/\"}, {\"title\": \"Why China's Oil Reserve Estimates Vary Between Sources\", \"topic\": \"Analysis\", \"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/china-oil-reserve-estimates-vary-sources\/\"}, {\"title\": \"Is China Still Stockpiling Oil in 2026?\", \"topic\": \"Energy\", \"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/is-china-still-stockpiling-oil-2026\/\"}, {\"title\": \"PetroChina and Sinopec: The Pivot From Fuels to Materials\", \"topic\": \"Energy\", \"href\": \"\/petrochina-sinopec-fuels-to-chemicals-pivot-2026\/\"}, {\"title\": \"Can Satellites See All of China's Oil Storage?\", \"topic\": \"Oil Markets\", \"href\": \"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/can-satellites-see-china-oil-storage\/\"}], \"listenTime\": \"8 min read\"}","p54_faq":"","p54_media":"","p54_comments_enabled":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[92,125],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analysis","category-strategy"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4098"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4100,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4098\/revisions\/4100"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectfifty4.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}